MUMBAI: The SSR case is already taken care by 3 departments, CBI, ED and NCB for the drug prob, the NCB have arrested the prime suspect of the case Rhea Chakraborty, brother Showik Chakraborty, house manager Samuel Miranda, staff Dipesh Sawant and alleged drug-peddler in the drug probe related to Sushant Singh Rajput death case. While a special Mumbai court rejected Rhea and Showik’s bail plea twice, reports suggested their lawyer Satish Maneshinde is likely to move the HC to file their bail plea application in the Bombay High Court today.
Now as per the latest update, Bombay High Court has adjourned Samuel Miranda, Dipesh Sawant and Bashit Parihar’s bail plea till September 29. On Friday, Bombay HC will now hear their bail plea on Sept 29. ANI Twitter, “Bombay High Court adjourns hearing on bail pleas of Samuel Miranda, Dipesh Sawant and Bashit Parihar till September 29 in a drug case related to the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput.”
The drug probe came up after alleged WhatsApp drug-chats of Rhea Chakraborty with drug-peddlers surfaced and were accessed by a news channel. During her 3-round of investigation with NCB, Rhea also named Bollywood actress Sara Ali Khan, Rakul Preet Singh and fashion designer Simone Khambatta.
ALSO READ – (SSR death probe: Chhichhore success party thrown by actor in March 2020 under NCB scanner)
Bombay High Court adjourns hearing on bail pleas of Samuel Miranda, Dipesh Sawant and Bashit Parihar till September 29 in a drug case related to the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput.
— ANI (@ANI) September 18, 2020
After rejecting Rhea and Showik’s bail plea, Mumbai special court had said that she could tamper with evidence if released. Not only that court also said there are no reasonable grounds to not connect Rhea with drugs. As reported by PTI, the Court said, “The investigation is at a preliminary stage, therefore, from the available record, it can not be said that there are no reasonable grounds to connect the accused (Rhea) (to the case). It is pertinent to note that in section 27(A) of the NDPS Act, no particular quantity of the drug is required to prove the offence. At this stage, when the investigation is at a preliminary stage, it can not be said that the said statement of the accused was forcefully recorded and (was thus) inadmissible as evidence.”
SOURCE – SPOTBOYE
ALSO READ – (Sona Mohapatra on Kangana's recent attacks: 'Worst act of opportunism')
Add new comment